CENTRO DE DISENO PORTOBELO

Unfortunately, many of Moscows new buildings were not good enough to replace those old ones lost, says Eugene e, Vice President of the Union of Moscow Architects

Duration : 0:4:37

[youtube sPcaUL1x3Dg]

11 Responses

1. rsnboy08 Says:
   September 14th, 2009 at 10:37 am

   its all good.
   its all good.

2. sinitskyd Says:
   September 14th, 2009 at 10:37 am

   sorry, I meant that …
   sorry, I meant that Moscow is number four, after St. Petersburg, Petrograd and Leningrad.

3. rsnboy08 Says:
   September 14th, 2009 at 10:37 am

   dude, its the same …
   dude, its the same city, if your talking about russian st. petersburg.

4. sinitskyd Says:
   September 14th, 2009 at 10:37 am

   Moscow is a …
   Moscow is a beautiful city. In fact, it is number 3 in the world after Leningrad and Saint Petersburg.

5. RussianDefender100 Says:
   September 14th, 2009 at 10:37 am

   Moscow is very …
   Moscow is very Historical and beautiful unlike
   the disgusting cities of AmUrica like
   New New York , San Francisco that has no
   historical value
   )

6. MarshallKutuzov Says:
   September 14th, 2009 at 10:37 am

   That’s right. 1920s …
   That’s right. 1920s-50s was a golden age of new building in Moscow. St P had been the capital, and Moscow was neglected. That all changed when the capital was moved back to Moscow in 1918.

7. jeaubu Says:
   September 14th, 2009 at 10:37 am

   “wonderful Stalin …
   “wonderful Stalin era” buildings??

8. anthony6661 Says:
   September 14th, 2009 at 10:37 am

   like to watch ,huh?
   like to watch ,huh?

9. MarshallKutuzov Says:
   September 14th, 2009 at 10:37 am

   I’ve been to San …
   I’ve been to San Francisco. It blows chunks.

10. anthony6661 Says:
    September 14th, 2009 at 10:37 am

    your new buildings …
    your new buildings suck he said it not me…

11. abarzilai664 Says:
    September 14th, 2009 at 10:37 am

    A city that does …
    A city that does not protect its history, is a city that spites its soul.

Leave a Comment