Comments on: Moscow’s architectural Babylon

By: anthony6661

anthony6661 — Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:37:10 +0000

your new buildings …
your new buildings suck he said it not me…

By: abarzilai664

abarzilai664 — Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:37:10 +0000

A city that does …
A city that does not protect its history, is a city that spites its soul.

By: jeaubu

jeaubu — Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:37:09 +0000

“wonderful Stalin …
“wonderful Stalin era” buildings??

By: anthony6661

anthony6661 — Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:37:09 +0000

like to watch ,huh?
like to watch ,huh?

By: MarshallKutuzov

MarshallKutuzov — Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:37:09 +0000

I’ve been to San …
I’ve been to San Francisco. It blows chunks.

By: sinitskyd

sinitskyd — Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:37:08 +0000

Moscow is a …
Moscow is a beautiful city. In fact, it is number 3 in the world after Leningrad and Saint Petersburg.

By: RussianDefender100

RussianDefender100 — Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:37:08 +0000

Moscow is very …
Moscow is very Historical and beautiful unlike
the disgusting cities of AmUrica like
New New York , San Francisco that has no
historical value
)

By: MarshallKutuzov

MarshallKutuzov — Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:37:08 +0000

That’s right. 1920s …
That’s right. 1920s-50s was a golden age of new building in Moscow. St P had been the capital, and Moscow was neglected. That all changed when the capital was moved back to Moscow in 1918.

By: rsnboy08

rsnboy08 — Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:37:07 +0000

its all good.
its all good.

By: sinitskyd

sinitskyd — Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:37:07 +0000

sorry, I meant that …
sorry, I meant that Moscow is number four, after St. Petersburg, Petrograd and Leningrad.